ВходНаше всё Теги codebook 无线电组件 Поиск Опросы Закон Пятница
5 июля
134606 Топик полностью
++ (10.10.2008 13:09, просмотров: 204) ответил Rst7 на Дело то десятое, только это дело повлекло отсутствие компилятора (качество порта третьего гнуся (а другим 2.4 ядро не соберешь) наверняка отвратительное, да и сам гнусь не блещет) - и как результат - никто в гражданке его применять не будет, не будет
Ядро 2.4 можно собирать gcc 4.1.1. См patch 2.4.36.7: http://www.vniins.ru/products/os/olyvia/index.php
Такж если бы разработчики поддерживали 2 ядра 2.4 и 2.6 в актуальном сотоянии... Ядра для комдив64 поддерживаются 2.4.36 и 2.6.26 (со всеми вытекающими из них драйверами). А ядро 2.4 им нужно, чтобы MCBC запустить- ВНИИНС другого ядра для своей ОС не береть.
diff --git a/Documentation/using-newer-gcc.txt b/Documentation/using-newer-gcc.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7834427 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/using-newer-gcc.txt @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +Building older versions of GCC compatible with Linux Kernel 2.4 +=============================================================== + + +This document explains how to build an older supported version of the GCC +compiler from a distribution which only offers incompatible recent versions. + + +Context +======= + +When Linux 2.4.0 was released in early 2001, GCC 2.95.2 was mainstream and +GCC 2.91.66 was still widely used. The GCC development model was evolving +and still confused. Since then, GCC has evolved a lot and stabilized. New +versions are regularly released, and some old features from the early code +get deprecated then removed. + +The kernel heavily relies on GCC's capabilities and behaviour. Some of the +code in Linux looks strange but is in fact intended to workaround early GCC +bugs. For these reasons, almost every new major GCC release breaks the kernel +build process. GCC 3.4 was a real pain to introduce as it required a lot of +rewriting in sensible areas, and GCC 4 required a lot of work, though this +work was less complicated thanks to the cleanup efforts invested in GCC 3.4. + +Starting with GCC 4.2, the output code randomly fails depending on section +ordering, which itself depends on the declaration order of functions, module +parameters and many other things. The nasty part is that the code builds but +randomly fails at runtime, so it is almost impossible to fix it and ensure +that everything works, especially in the drivers area where most of the +problems lie. + +As of 2008, GCC 4.3.2 is advertised as the current release and 4.2 the previous +release. Most distributions have been shipping with 4.2 and 4.3 for some time, +so building Linux 2.4 on a recent distribution has become a real problem for +users who still have to support kernel 2.4 on servers, firewalls or any other +system. + + +Solution : the two-minutes process +================================== + +If it is not possible to adapt the kernel to GCC, let's adapt GCC to the +kernel. We're lucky, building GCC to build just a kernel is not hard and +is rather fast. I call that a two-minutes process because building an +older GCC takes about 1 minute, and the kernel with that GCC also takes +one minute. + +First, you have to select which version of GCC you want to build your kernel +with. Here are some comments on possible versions : + + - 2.95.3 : very well tested for the kernel, builds kernels very fast, + requires a lot of patches and is rather hard to build.. + + - 3.0 : very buggy, avoid it. + + - 3.1 & 3.2 : apparently less buggy but rarely used so bugs might have + remained unnoticed. + + - 3.3 : used and tested for a long time. A bit slow but easy to build. + + - 3.4 : was recently introduced, received less testing, though seems + OK. Builds kernels faster than 3.3, and is easy to build too. + + - 4.0 & 4.1 : received little testing, particularly slow but may produce + smaller kernels when compiled with -Os. + +Always take the last maintenance version of a compiler (eg: 3.4.6 for 3.4). + +For best reliability and less hassle, I tend to recommend GCC 3.3.6. For +improved build times (about 30% lower) and improved kernel performance, I'd +recommend 3.4.6. It tends to produce more efficient code on i386, but has +had a long history of causing annoyances with inline declarations. It seems +OK though, and I build all my kernels with it. We'll assume 3.4 is used for +the rest of this document, though what is described will work with 3.3 to +4.1 unless stated otherwise. + + +Instructions +============ + +1) Download gcc sources from the nearest mirror +----------------------------------------------- + +Find a mirror address here : [ http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html ] or download +from this directory : + + ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.4.6/ + +Get gcc-core-3.4.6.tar.bz2. It only contains the C compiler, which is what you +want. + +2) Prepare your build environment +--------------------------------- + +Create a temporary directory where you'll extract the sources. Don't build on +NFS, it may be slow. Use /tmp if you want. You'll need about 150 MB of free +space. You'll have to extract the sources in that new directory, and create a +temporary build directory aside it : + + $ mkdir /tmp/gcc-build + $ cd /tmp/gcc-build + $ tar jxf /tmp/gcc-core-3.4.6.tar.bz2 + $ mkdir build + +3) Configure gcc +---------------- + +You don't want your new gcc to conflict with the one already in place. I +recommend simply prefixing it with "kernel-", and not installing it in +/usr/bin, but rather /opt/kgcc/bin or anywhere else (/usr/local/bin will be +used by default). I recommend choosing a place you already have in your PATH +(such as the default /usr/local/bin), so that you don't have to pass the full +path to the binary when building. + + $ cd /tmp/gcc-build/build + $ ../gcc-3.4.6/configure --disable-locale --disable-shared --disable-nls \ + --enable-languages=c \ + --prefix=/opt/kgcc --program-prefix=kernel- + +If you're using GCC 3.3, you may see strange messages indicating that some +programs were not found (eg: kernel-objdump). Simply ignore them. + +Note that you can set a lot of options, even use it as a cross-compiler. While +very frequent, such a build will not be covered by this document. + +4) Build GCC +------------ + +Both GCC 3.3 and 3.4 support parallel building, which reduces build time on SMP +systems : + + $ make -j 4 + +If the build fails here because of some options you added above, you'll have to +remove the build dir and recreate it. + +5) Install your new GCC +----------------------- + +The binaries may be a bit big, but you can strip them. Both GCC 3.3 and 3.4 +support a trick on the command line during the installation process, which +consists in passing the "-s" flag to "install" : + + $ sudo make install INSTALL_PROGRAM='${INSTALL} -s' + +It will be installed under the directory referred to by the "prefix" option +above, or /usr/local/bin if none was specified : + + $ ls -l /opt/kgcc/bin/kernel-gcc + -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 73124 Sep 6 22:45 /opt/kgcc/bin/kernel-gcc + + $ /opt/kgcc/bin/kernel-gcc -v + Reading specs from /tmp/gcc-3.4.6-build/tmp-inst/opt/kgcc/bin/... + Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.6/configure --disable-shared --disable-... + Thread model: posix + gcc version 3.4.6 + +6) Using your new compiler +-------------------------- + +The compiler just has to be passed to "make" via the "CC" variable for all +commands : + + $ make CC=/opt/kgcc/bin/kernel-gcc -j 4 dep bzImage modules modules_install + + or more simply, when you have it in your path : + + $ make CC=kernel-gcc -j 4 dep bzImage modules modules_install + + +Conclusion +========== + +Building an older GCC on to build an older kernel on a newer machine is not +really hard. It becomes harder when you have to cross-build (eg: you're +building on a 64-bit machine for a 32-bit one). But for this, I would recommend +that you check the excellent "crosstool" utility from Dan Kegel. It supports a +wide variety of compilers, contains a lot of fixes and will do all the hard +patching and configuration work for any combination you want or need. + + +Suggestions and comments +======================== + +If you find mistakes or want to send comments about this document, please mail +me at <w@1wt.eu>. +
++